Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bratbag's commentslogin

War against someone who wants my society eradicated provides a lot of value to my people.


And much more pain, misery and suffering to people who never wished you anything bad but happen to live on the other side.


do you have the intelligence to verify that?


Its a really interesting question.

Lets take it to its farthest extent: can you take a picture of a black hole?


Or how about this: can you take a photograph of a shadow?


Or a life where everyone operates in absolutes, with no shades of grey allowed.

Zero reflection and total constant analysis paralysis are both non viable.


Oh, I absolutely agree!


Or the value of everything non ai drops to zero, which makes the value of ai infinite by comparison.


Either ways it'll be the end of the USD as we know it. But then again such fantasy situations had been "predicted" numerous times and never once came to be a reality.


It's not about blindly accepting autogenerated code. Its using them for tooling integration.

Its like terminal autocomplete on steroids. Everything around the code is blazing fast.


The majority of obese people want to be thin, but will die obese anyway.

Just wanting something that requires a significant overhaul of how you do things, is not enough.


better analogy: the majority of fouix-gras birds would prefer not to be force-fed and caged.

The people working in the bureaucracy do not have the authority to overhaul it.


The people working in the bureaucracy chose to be there. Bureaucracies self select for people that are okay with it. I'm sure there's a few who are there to change it from the inside but they are the exception.

You're not going to find a lot of vegans working in a meat packing plant.


But you are going to find vegans working in a slaughterhouse. Some people prioritise pragmatism over ideological purity. (See https://our-compass.org/2020/06/15/i-worked-undercover-insid... and parts of https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-50986683.)


> But you are going to find vegans working in a slaughterhouse.

Your first link is the first-person account of a vegan who went undercover to document the abject cruelty that exists in slaughterhouses. The pragmatism was in service of a mission to protect animals by disseminating information on such cruelty rather than the “I need a job.” type of pragmatism. There’s a moral distinction here.


The first link's narrator blew the whistle to industry regulators on practices unethical by non-vegan standards, something that is only possible if you're on the ground. The second link quotes an interview:

> Basically, I'm an animal lover. I don't take any pleasure in what we're doing, but if I can do it as quietly and professionally as possible, then I think we've achieved something.

I was not at all referring to 'the "I need a job" type of pragmatism' (which would not be moral pragmatism for a vegan); rather, doing a job that involves killing animals in such a way that your presence reduces the marginal harm could be seen as defensible to a vegan.


If this reduces error rates to below those of a human, then that's an acceptable approach.

Unless you think humans code reviewing humans is pointless because errors sometimes still slip through?


Pass.

Im glad not to be confined by historical rules invented by people who could not hope to predict the future, and would not choose to put that kind of burden on my descendents.


Amendments can be made with a super-majority's approval


The libertarian fantasy where its possible to exist without the choices of others impacting you, doesn't work in the real world.


True, but in the UK (and many other so-called democracies) it's not fellow citizens/voters who impact our lives the most.

Rather, it's vested and sectional interests who control power and or have the most effective means to bring the citizenry around to their way of thinking.

As Chomsky would put it, these few have the means to manufacture consent.


They voted against it because they thought it didn't go far enough.


Do you have any sources for that? I'm genuinely interested. I've heard it mentioned before as fact, but a quick search of Hansard[1][2] only turned up one very vocal Labour politician (Alex Davies-Jones).

[1] https://hansard.parliament.uk/ [2] It was a very quick search.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: