Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | declan_roberts's commentslogin

The only thing that compares to this is probably Mac mini with MLX models.

Radeon 9700 pro or intel arc b70 (both $1000-1400, 32GB, 650GB/s bandwidth), or ryzen AI max 390 (more vram, less bandwidth)

The local inference space is pretty good nowadays.


It's funny you can take something that every major multinational company does and slap "Tesla" on it and then write a whole news story.

> The practice, while controversial, is a common maneuver through which multinational corporations use loopholes in tax law to save money by moving profit from one jurisdiction to another with more favorable tax rules. “It’s not the way the international tax system should work,”

Yes but that is how it works and it can be changed at any moment in the US Congress. There seems to be bipartisan support for it working this way, in fact.


> It's funny you can take something that every major multinational company does and slap "Tesla" on it and then write a whole news story.

What's your alternative? Never write about these practices after the first instance gets an article?

IMHO, it's newsworthy that a particular company does this, and the exploitation of tax loopholes is an evergreen topic until those loopholes disappear or cease being controversial.

> There seems to be bipartisan support for it working this way, in fact.

Is there actual affirmative bipartisan support for this, or a lack of sufficient support or ability to push a change through our dysfunctional congress? With the filibuster and Republican attitudes about taxes, I'm sure any change would have to clear a super-majority.


That was kind of my take... not only that, but you can be against a practice, but still use it while it's there... There's a certain amount of fiscal/fiduciary responsibility the heads of companies have that could get them into trouble if they didn't take advantage of any loopholes they're aware of.

That said, like you mention... It would be easy enough for Congress to change the law and even add incentives or fees for trying to shift financial profits or exfiltrating currency/value altogether.


I'm very surprised at the quality of the new Gemma 4 models. On my 32 gig Mac mini I can be very productive with it. Not close to replacing paid AI by a long shot, but if I had to tighten the belt I could do it as someone who already knows how to program.

love hearing this. and think about it, if the 2B is already doing this well on your mac mini, imagine what the 4B, 26B, or 31B can do on 32 gigs. with lower quantization you can fit pretty much any of them. if you want full precision you still have solid options at the 2B and 4B level. you're sitting on way more capability than you're probably using right now. the coding block on just the 2B scored 8.44 and caught bugs most people would miss. glad you're getting real use out of it, thanks for reading.

What's your setup/usecase? Enhanced intellisense?

Apple is paying Google $1billion for an AI strategy that runs on device. We're seeing the preview of what that will look like.

I really hope this is a preview of the replacement for Siri that Google is creating bc these models are fantastic for their size!

Google is not creating a replacement for anything.

Apple is getting a base Gemini model (not a Gemma), and it will run on Apple private compute. Apple foundational models will remain the on device model


Heritage foundation? Lol give me a break.

From Project 2025[0], published by the Heritage Foundation:

   Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it 
   should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be 
   classed as registered sex offenders.
[0] https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeade...

Check out https://agelesslinux.org/lobbyists.html

They're specially trying to get people to believe this is a right wing thing. Effective strategy as we can see by the comments.

> This matters because it preempts the easiest dismissal: that age verification mandates are a right-wing culture war project. They are not.


Interestingly, I saw this linked to on Mastodon just now and immediately thought of you.

Check it[0] out. I think you'll find it illuminating.

[0] https://www.techdirt.com/2026/04/16/the-right-wing-origins-a...


Are you claiming that Project 2025[0] isn't a right wing thing?

If, by you, the Heritage Foundation isn't right wing then what would be?

That's not a rhetorical question.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025


We need to look into this sudden "spontaneous" coordination among lawmakers to implement age verification software.

What is the common denominator? Whose lead are they following, and whose money are they taking?



If I had a dollar to bet, I would say that such global effort would highly benefit Microsoft that is loosing grounds in high proportion in the area of desktop OS and is trying very hard to impose mandatory microsoft "cloud" accounts to be able to use computers.

There are likely at least dozens of different lobbies that can gain some advantage from pushing this.

Is the advantage corporate money lining their pockets?

Or is there another one?


Dozens of different lobbies means there’s no clear cut list of advantages.

Unless you just want an exhaustive enumeration of every possible human desire.


> What is the common denominator?

Criticism of Israel and its agents will be outlawed by all means necessary and anybody who questions it will be black bagged. That is the end goal. This is total war.


Ctrl+f is a bad offender. No I don't want to use your contextual search. I want to search for this word on this page!

If the page is lazy loading content then the local ctrl+f is not going to work, obviously.

If you’re hinting at an argument about whether lazy loading content should exist, that’s a separate discussion. In my experience, pages that override ctrl+f do it for a good reason


I think I've seen one page override ctrl-f for good reason -- it was a page that lazy loaded literally millions of lines of text that wouldn't have fit into RAM.

Every single other page that does it just wastes my time. It's always a super janky slow implementation that somehow additionally fails to actually search through all the text on the page.


then instead of lazy loading load chunks and paginate it like we used to

Even in those cases I'd prefer to just be able to natively search the content that has been lazy loaded. I've run into more than one website where the search functionality they bound to control-f is horrible.

On Firefox, the “Prevent Shortcut Takeover” can be used to prevent websites from binding to Ctrl+F/Cmd+F: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/prevent-short....

Half of the time those sites also lazy load anyway so whatever you're looking for isn't even in the DOM yet

And lazy unload, so you can't find it even if you've already scrolled through the whole thing.

I used to hear it called "virtual scroll", and I remember webpages ballooning in RAM when they didn't do it.

the text content of the site is not what is ballooning the RAM.

Yeah, super annoying when that happens. A workaround is to click the address bar (or press ctrl+l unless that's been hijacked too) and then do ctrl+f.

Just use Ctrl+G - it does almost the exact same thing as Ctrl+F

it's asking me for a line number

Ctrl-f for page search and ctrl-k for website search[1].

[1] https://fmhy.net


Agreed. I also like slash / to focus the primary input like on youtube

I saw the Twitter meme and knew instantly he was going to be a good follow. Was not disappointed!

"Nothing ever happens"

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: