A valuable part of the ADS-B out mandate is that planes even as small as mine (a.k.a. tiny) can cheaply (<200$US) pick up ADS-B in and display it on a consumer tablet. My private airplanes now have pseudo radar. Not every airplane in the air is broadcasting, but most are. This is a huge safety win. Almost without exception I'll see airplanes on my tablet long before I have visual on them.
Without ADS-B out on your airplane (which you don't have for <$200), you will only pick up mode-C traffic in your area if there's another airplane nearby with ADS-B out and coded to receive ADS-B in. You would then be intercepting/"piggybacking" the traffic transmissions meant for that airplane.
Fortunately (unpopular opinion among pilots) the FAA is slowly phasing in ADS-B out as required equipment. Starting Jan 1 of this year, you need to tx ADS-B if you're anywhere you'd otherwise need a Mode-C transponder, including around many airports.
> Achieving human-level performance on any real-world task is an exceedingly difficult endeavor when moving away from a few simple and well-defined tasks.
It's an exceedingly difficult endeavor to try to get all humans to produce "human-level performance" while doing simple and well-defined tasks. Evidence = Mechanical Turk.
An interesting thing to note there is that research shows that untrained individuals have significant variance in task performance which decreases as they get better at the task. Mechanical Turk might be an extreme case, since all tasks are done by untrained individuals.
Whilst I agree with the quote that AI has difficulties when moving away from well-defined tasks, so do we. Most expert performance is constricted to narrow task domains, does not transfer well to other domains, and takes a long time to acquire. In a sense, that's not too dissimilar to AI.
I do disagree with the "simple". Games such as Chess are the stereotypical example for things AI performs well in. Their rulesets are well defined, but the games are incredibly complex. It is amazing that AI outperforms even grandmasters in this area.
I've worked for companies as a remote worker, and I've owned a company that for its entire lifetime hired remote staff. In my experience, as long as you hire good people, the time zone delta is the only limitation that's extremely difficult if not impossible to overcome. Everything else can be solved with good communication (which should exist anyway), good requirements (which should exist anyway), and good process (which should exist anyway).
If the time zone range of a team is less than about 4, then in my experience the team works quite well. If the range is greater than 5, it almost always encounters problems that even good process, requirements, and communication struggle to solve.
I have this argument with my wife every few months. She posts things on a popular social media platform and sets them "private" in full expectation that the content will only be shared with those she selects. Then she gets pissed when she later discovers the privacy settings didn't work the way she expected.
Anything pushed to the internet should be assumed public unless encrypted using open source encryption tools you completely control in a safe zone (like in Tails). All internet activity should be assumed to be logged somewhere, somehow. I don't even 100% trust Tor.
Maybe something that copies military basic training. It has been decades, but I can still hear my drill instructor yelling, "You aren't tired until I tell you you're tired!" He was right.
>90% of fatigue in basic (based on a scientific study I just made up in my head) is mentally induced because recruits have a belief of their limits that's short of reality. Part of the drill instructor's responsibility is to demonstrate these limits are just mental by pushing recruits beyond them. Of course, that still leaves the <10% of times when the limits are real and someone gets hurt, but that's just collateral damage, I guess.
I wonder if it's really 10%. The instructor most likely doesn't actually know the person's limits. They're setting a baseline and hoping everyone has good enough genetics to meet that baseline. The rest are injured/kicked out/may have actually been filtered out earlier. Remember that the military turns down many people, and that often includes a lot of people who have hidden medical issues or just bad genetics.
I don't think criminals are stupid; they're simply lazy. They put the minimum amount of effort is into a scam like this in order to make it profitable.
Criminals come in all shapes and sizes, at all levels of intelligence, skill, and laziness or lack thereof. There are indeed criminals who aren't stupid but are lazy; but in my experience counseling the incarcerated, most criminals (that I spoke to in a non-scientific, non-random sampling) were both stupid and lazy. Of course, maybe that's confirmation bias, because I only spoke to the criminals who got caught.
What I found most fascinating were the criminals who were smart in the short-view, stupid in the long-view, and extraordinarily not lazy. Many young hackers fit into this category. They work long hours and invest a lot of effort in a crime, thinking all the while that the investment had a better return than non-criminal activity over the long-term.
This happens with airports a lot. Some really wonderful and generous old pilot or aviation engineer dies, so the field gets renamed in honor of the person. But aviators still refer to the field by it's traditional name. It's not a slight against the honored dead; rather, it's just out of habit and the fact that it's tremendously easier to remember "$CITY_NAME Airport" than it is "$GUY_WHO_DIED Field".
Speaking of airports, I know of several people who outright refuse to refer to Washington National Airport by its current name, "Ronald Regan Washington National Airport". They will go so far as to correct someone who says "Regan National" and insist, "Washington National."
Some people in DC are still annoyed by the renaming, partly because of the air controller thing, and partly because Congress changed the name against the wishes of the people of DC and then forced DC to pay for changing the signs out of the city's budget.
Definitely. Ever wonder why New Orleans' airport has the symbol MSY, but is named Louis Armstrong airport? MSY stands for Moisant Stock Yards, in honor of early aviator John Moisant.
Im recent years, the city renamed the airport to Louis Armstrong airport, but no one in the city refers to it as that. Everyone still calls it Moisant. Not that we don't like Louis Armstrong, it's always been called Moisant and New Orleans really doesn't like change.
I always wondered why that airport was called MSY.
However, I can think of one counterexample: JFK airport in NYC. It used to be called Idlewild, named after some golf course I think, but was renamed to JFK (with the airport code JFK) back in the 60s. No one knows what "Idlewild" is any more.
Another fun example is the Louisville International Airport which was originally named Standiford Field, thus the airport code SDF and even locals still sometimes refer to it as Standiford, but in this case was renamed to the more obvious choice (Louisville International Airport) to confuse people less.
A further tangent, but the more obvious airport code LOU is still in active use across town at Bowman Field, the city's original air field (definitely not an airport) and these days the oldest remaining continually operating air field in the country.
Random aside but when I was a kid in the early 80s I found a radio in my grandparents basement which could pick up the radio chatter at Bowman. I would listen to that thing every time we visited
So this is somewhat OT, but in reading the slides, I noticed this gem:
> Potential money is worth more than actual money.
In very, very rare circumstances, that is true. In the vast majority of cases, it's total B$. It's what company founders tell employees to exploit them, to get them to work overtime as a norm for crap normal-time pay. It's what the founders genuinely hope is true because they own so much of the company, but it rarely turns out that your shares are worth as much as the net-present-value of the delta to an average salary. At least in my experience.
It's really easy if you purchase lots of little things using a non-cash form of payment. It's even easier if what you're buying is non-physical, like streaming movies or video games for a tablet/phone. The key is to remove the physicality on one or both ends of the transaction and keep the single transaction cost in 2-digit range or the low 3-digits. And of course, never budget, ever, and try not to mentally track how many purchases you've made over the past few weeks. Do that as a pattern, give it some time, and money will evaporate Brewster's Millions style.
Only the rare whale can make a huge debt in savings buy spending on digital goods. The real money goes out on car payments, rent payments, vacations, and eating out every day.
You could rent an HD movie every night for $20 and it'd still only swing your expenses by $600 each month. If you're making $35,000, that is absolutely huge.
If you're making $150,000 - it really should not be huge.
