LC questions are a shitty way to qualify 3 traits that employers very much look for (and have proven to be correlated):
* Available time to prepare (esp. when holding a job) = available to work long hours
* Self-motivate themselves for a long time (esp. to do such bullshit work)
* Mental capacity to remember all the material (esp. given its useless outside of the interview loop)
The flip of the coin are people who can't put in the time due to e.g. family obligations, don't have the motivation, or don't have the mental capacity.
It's strange to me how people keep comparing cryptocurrencies to equity, but don't compare them to their closest counterpart - fiat currencies.
Are fiat currencies treated like securities? No.
Are there "best execution requirements" when I exchange my USD for EUR. No.
Did somebody have to register the Brazilian Real with the SEC for it to be exchangeable in the US? No.
You invented and answered your own false premise. You set it up by proclaiming fiat the closest counterpart, and then proclaimed that fiat isn't treated like a security. You're the one saying it's closest to fiat, not the regulators. The regulators consider it to be more like an asset class and not fiat money like USD. They have been very clear about that.
> Did somebody have to register the Brazilian Real with the SEC for it to be exchangeable in the US? No.
There is in fact a considerable regulatory system in place as it pertains to exchanging currency, currency laws, and so on.
My premise is that I don't agree with the regulator :) Of course a regulator is there to regulate so their incentive is to find things to regulate.
> The regulators consider it to be more like an asset class
Being an asset is also applicable in my opinion. But assets and securities are not the same, and this is what's changing - regulators switching the categorization from assets (which was implicitly and somewhat explicitly the state until now) to securities.
Yes, I’m familiar with how it’s used. And its usage seems pretty clearly at odds with “People cannot create fiat currencies out of thin air without it being a crime”. (I could have used any number of other examples - WoW gold, Disney Dollars, etc.)
Yea, turns out the rule of law works rather well, and when it doesn't work well nothing is going to stop the henchmen from beating you to death with a hammer anyway. What makes a government a government is their monopoly on violence, what makes a good government good is only having to minimally exercise their monopoly.
Yes, it works well for transferring enormous amounts of wealth into a few hands. As seen ever since the introduction of fiat money, for thousands of years of history.
The essential point is that they are not ruler or lords or saviors. We hired them to work for us, and democracies turn out to work better than any other form of government in history (and it's not close).
We are the rulers, lords, and the only hope for our own salvation. You'd better get to work.
I didn't hire or vote for any central banker, and neither did you. We were born into the fiat system, the rules already written and specifically made to exploit us.
And I completely agree with your second paragraph.
I did vote for my president, who hired the central bankers, and senators, who confirmed them. They also built the entire structure of the current fiat system over time.
Vs the very poor peasants of the people who run the mining companies or control the software? Haven’t you just swapped one set of sovereigns for another?
Except that anybody can mine, just like anybody could mine gold or trap squirrels. To make fiat currency emissions you need to be born into the right family.
That's not exactly true, though. Only coins that are backed by something are treated as securities: ICOs, stablecoins and similar. ETH for example is not a security by any definition used in the US. This is why bitcoin specifically not included in those lawsuits.
I'm one of Domino's 8 engineers and wanted to provide a bit of depth.
My colleagues are all smart, experienced and very motivated. They have taught me a lot (not just Scala :)) and even though I'm quite new I'm already working on some of the most critical components. We all take an active role in deciding the future of the product, including joining calls with customers and talking to them directly.
We have a very solid development process and care deeply about maintaining a high level of product quality. This is especially important for our on-premise users who have more controls around updating their deployment. We are all full-stack developers and take different roles on different issues which keeps us engaged with every part of the product. This is going to be even more vital now that the team is expanding rapidly.
We use Scala, Play, Backbone, and Docker (lots of it).
We have a massive roadmap and I am very excited about what's coming. I'm sure you will like it here!
* Available time to prepare (esp. when holding a job) = available to work long hours
* Self-motivate themselves for a long time (esp. to do such bullshit work)
* Mental capacity to remember all the material (esp. given its useless outside of the interview loop)
The flip of the coin are people who can't put in the time due to e.g. family obligations, don't have the motivation, or don't have the mental capacity.