Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
NIST Physicists Show ‘Molecules’ Made of Light May Be Possible (nist.gov)
77 points by brisance on Sept 9, 2015 | hide | past | favorite | 17 comments


Here is the original paper on Arxiv:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03859

What the linked article fails to mention among all the fantasizing about light sabers is that this kind of interaction is only possible in matter. These "molecules made of light" can only exist when photons interact with atoms while the light travels in a very special medium.

In vacuum, photon-photon interactions do not allow for any kind of bound states like that.


Just to echo your point: This is an interesting proposal more because of the ability to use for photonic information applications (quantum gates and such) then for light-sabers.

Fair warning to those looking at the original paper: I have my PhD as an experimentalist in this field, and it took me a while to work through what they were proposing :)


Why do people think of lightsabers first? I think better control over light leads to true holograms, primarily. Frankly, if holograms and lightsabers both magically appeared tomorrow, I would lean towards holograms being more important.


The answer is simple, very, very simple.

Lightsabers would be more fun.


Holodeck vs Lightsabers, hmm I am sticking with Holodeck. :)


Holodeck implies lightsabers, I think


Lightsabers are plasma anyway. So really we should be focusing on fusion research to nail down the magnetic plasma containment technologies.


tokamak tomahawk?


I thought of Arnold Rimmer first.


Note that in the article linked above, no real matter is created, just configurations that "act" as matter.

However, from [1]:

> [...] scientists at Imperial College London (including a visiting physicist from Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics) think they’ve figured out how to turn energy directly into matter [...] Their article in Nature Photonics proposes that a new kind of collider be built, one that smashes photons instead of protons, as at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN where the Higgs boson was discovered last year.

Of course, this probably requires much more energy.

[1] http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulrodgers/2014/05/19/einstein-...


Are they seriously still running a Cold Fusion website?

Note: it'd be nice if the site could survive being on HN's cover. My past experience with CF makes me thing it's a poor choice if you want that.


Believe it or not, there are still websites out there running Perl with CGI. Not even Danser or Mojolicious, CGI.pm.


I wonder how many of those can survive being on the cover of HN.


Depends on HW, but that likely takes less resources than most websites. For reference, an old CF website used to support 60k users and a few thousand page views a second on a dual 450 MHz (Pentium III Xeon 450) cpu's. A modern CPU could probably serve 10x that.


Well, we technically haven't invented warm fusion yet...


Warm fusion is the only kind we have invented.


Arguably it's more accurate to say that fusion has invented us ;)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: