Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder sometimes whether rationalization came before logic. Perhaps using logic in a rigorous way (as in a mathematical proof) evolved out of persuasive techniques that are intended to get people to believe you, regardless of whether you're right?

Looking for logical flaws in arguments might have arisen as defense against persuasive techniques.



You'd probably be interested in the research of Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber on this very point: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-... People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - The New York Times




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: