Because you are making a lot of assumptions. For example:
"the Earth has been getting warmer and human activity probably has something to do with it."
Is different from "The earth is getting warmer because of human activity."
In fact, you go on to say: "Humans may have something to do with it, and they may not. There is still debate on what the causes might be and much research still needs to be done."
A debate on this implies that their are those who think human activity is partly to blame.
Finally, you go on to say this:
>I find it ironic that scientists can act so religious-like on this topic and have faith in the belief that humans are the sole reason behind global warming without solid scientific proof.
Religious-like? Faith? Humans are the sole reason?
"human activity probably has something to do with it."
That's why you are getting down voted. Stop overreacting. =)
Because you are making a lot of assumptions. For example:
"the Earth has been getting warmer and human activity probably has something to do with it."
Is different from "The earth is getting warmer because of human activity."
In fact, you go on to say: "Humans may have something to do with it, and they may not. There is still debate on what the causes might be and much research still needs to be done."
A debate on this implies that their are those who think human activity is partly to blame.
Finally, you go on to say this:
>I find it ironic that scientists can act so religious-like on this topic and have faith in the belief that humans are the sole reason behind global warming without solid scientific proof.
Religious-like? Faith? Humans are the sole reason?
"human activity probably has something to do with it."
That's why you are getting down voted. Stop overreacting. =)