Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a quote out of context with bad faith.

> The leak exposed massive corruption by Daniel Arap Moi, and the Kenyan people sat up and took notice. In the ensuing elections, in which corruption became a major issue, violence swept the country. "1,300 people were eventually killed, and 350,000 were displaced. That was a result of our leak," says Assange.

The leak informed major corruption by the government. That's what the leak has done and I don't think any person in their right mind argues it's a wrong thing to do.

Even the U.S. has whistle blower protection laws to allow such leaks. I'd argue that this would be a very good example of WikiLeaks doing good.

I come from a corrupt, third world country (Iran), who has recently had it's share of corruption and violent election issues.

Anyone exposing those crimes of the government would be a champion. What happens after the leaks, the uprising and violence, is not the responsibility of whistle blower but people who commit those specific crimes.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: