Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They're claiming higher efficiency because of less iron loss. Does it balance out?



"ABSTRACT: The application of permanent magnet machines as direct-drive generators for wind turbines is considered. The Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet (AFPM) machine with slots is compared to the Radial-Flux Permanent-Magnet (RFPM) machine, for this application. Using a computer-based design model, the two machine types are optimized with respect to the lowest Cost/Torque. Design optimization for maximum Torque/Volume is also investigated. The calculations show that the RFPM machine has lower Cost/Torque than the AFPM machine with slots, and lower torque/volume than the AFPM machine with slots.

...

Conclusion... ...Based on the results presented herein, the RFPM machine still appears as a better choice for a direct-drive generator, than the AFPM machine with slots"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: