Wait what? Is the author suggesting that antirez stop his efforts on Redis and switch to working on MySQL stored routines? It says, "Itβs just proof that antirez has options about where to spend his time." And then it switches gears to talking about SQLite. And then about BDB and Membase and Innostore and Bitcask and Riak and Solr and his MIT class number.
I'm sure this author has a point he's trying to make, but I can't seem to make out what it is.
I think the point the author is trying to make is that antirez should not be wasting his time re-inventing the persistence wheel. As in, there are already many persistence plays available that are proven to work within known bounds.
I'm sure this author has a point he's trying to make, but I can't seem to make out what it is.