> PRs are an afterthought and not what you want to spend your time on as an engineer.
Couldn't disagree more, and don't even understand where it's coming from. When you've dome a substantial body of work, it certainly makes sense -- and is satisfying, and enjoyable -- to explain what it is and how it works and present it to people. And it makes sense for those reviewers, given that they work on the same codebase, to learn about the code change.
I get the impression that the authors of TFA maybe just aren't writing any interesting code.
Couldn't disagree more, and don't even understand where it's coming from. When you've dome a substantial body of work, it certainly makes sense -- and is satisfying, and enjoyable -- to explain what it is and how it works and present it to people. And it makes sense for those reviewers, given that they work on the same codebase, to learn about the code change.
I get the impression that the authors of TFA maybe just aren't writing any interesting code.