Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> People will start asking where your funds are coming from.

This is a weird statement.

If it's a cash offer, it's a seller's job to determine if you have the money, not if you paid taxes on it.

If it's a mortgage down payment, then the bank is more interested in if your assets are going to disappear (e.g. are they actually a loan from a third party?). I've never had a mortgage bank inquire about my tax situation.

If you're talking about IRS audits... then yes, they might be curious how you purchased a giant asset without any declared income. But that's similar to any unreported income situation.



>> People will start asking where your funds are coming from.

>This is a weird statement.

Not in the UK. Here there's a legal obligation on the conveyancing practitioner - which you have to use - to confirm the source of funds for the purchase. They "will ask questions about your salary, request bank statements and ask you to give details of any family inheritances"[1].

[1] https://www.bannerjones.co.uk/your-property/services/buying/...


Are those the new UK regulations intended to prevent dirty money from buying real estate?

Or has it always been a thing?


I believe it is also the case in large parts of the EU and yes, that is the reason why.


> If it's a cash offer, it's a seller's job to determine if you have the money, not if you paid taxes on it.

Yes, but your bank and the bank of the seller both have strict KYC/AML rules to respect. And the seller probably doesn't want to accept a pile of bills that requires laundering.


I think we can agree that KYC/AML rules are... somewhat effective, in the face of determination to circumvent.

Honestly, to op's point, the IRS audit would be the likeliest to nail you, post-purchase.

"Person without demonstrated income suddenly buys expensive asset" is hard to hide and a huge, trackable signal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: