It is not affine transforms per se but rather the expansion into homogeneous coordinates that enables translation by treating it as if it's a shear that leaves the reciprocal dimension untouched.
> Rotation = multiplying by an imaginary unit.
This is also not quite right.
Rotation is multiplying by a complex number with a magnitude of 1 (or perhaps you meant to say "raising a number to the power of i"?)
> Rotation = multiplying by an imaginary unit.
This is also not quite right.
Rotation is multiplying by a complex number with a magnitude of 1 (or perhaps you meant to say "raising a number to the power of i"?)