Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I can't reply to dang's informational post, but in light of the new claims from defcon, isn't the previous discussion title potentially defamatory?

> (dang) Previous related thread: Defcon stiffs badge HW vendor, drags FW author offstage during talk



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: