They went a whole article without describing the reaction under test.

That's because there wasn't one, so far? Which you could have read for yourself, if you've had followed this link https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/391563... which they've posted in the opening sentence as the sixth 'word'?

Agreed. So we are on the same page: this article was essentially pointless. Just post the other one next time?