That sounds like it could be an intiresting metric. Worth noting that there is a difference between an algorithmic "best of n" selection (via eg. an FID score) vs. manual cherry picking which takes more factors into account such as user preference and also takes time to evaluate, which is what GP was suggesting.
This is a bit pedantic, but FID score wouldn't really be a viable metric for best of n selection since it's a metric that's only computable for distributions of samples. FID score is also pretty high variance for small sample sizes, so you need a lot of samples to compute a meaningful FID score.
Better metrics (assuming goal is text->image) would be some sort of inception score or CLIP-based text matching score. These metrics are computable on single samples.
Yeah I’d likely just pick the best scoring one (that is, the pick is made by the evaluation tool, not the model) - to simulate “whatever the receiver deemed best for what they wanted”.
