No, unless turning consumer products into data center use becomes relevant at large scale.
There was a time when companies and research labs bought Sony PS2 (and the PS3) to build supercomputer clusters. Japan placed export controls on the PS2 because they had militarily-useful computing power. According to DIA report 4,000 PS2 units had been purchased in the United States and shipped to Iraq in just 2-3 months during 2000.
Were the PS2s shipped to Iraq for computing or just for soldiers to play during their down time? I feel like the latter is far more likely, especially since we know that soldiers had access to game consoles for recreation.
I can't imagine what general purpose software they'd have wanted to run on a PlayStation 2 from 2000 that they couldn't run on a general purpose laptop in 2004.
You're being down voted, but it's the truth. PS2 were sold so much below cost it wasn't uncommon to see hobbiests and institutions building beowulf clusters with them.
But these days, consoles aren't sold below cost, and gigabit network isn't fast enough to make cluster computing make sense
The PS2 was a state of the art machine with similar hardware of a SGI workstation. Those computers started at 20k. While the PS5 has similar hardware as a low end PC.
If the PS5 had a Nvidia A100 the comparasion would make sense and people would be buying them to create clusters, like they did with the PS2 and 3.
The article says: "no longer manufacture AI chips at advanced process nodes of 7 nanometers or smaller." This was triggered when Huawei produced some kind of device with TSMC wafers of this class.
Maybe standard ARM cores are still approved for export to the mainland.
Wondering when we are going to hit the point where our basic every day devices face export controls.