> "RustCamp" would likely be adjudicated as a trademark violation if it went to court.
Used in what context, though? As far as I am aware, each trademark is only granted for a specific list of market segments. Anything beyond that, and beyond offering products/services, should be (mostly) in the clear.
I think it's a good idea from the Rust Foundation to prevent others from naming threir convention "RustCamp" or something similar, and I don't think they're doing much more.
Used in what context, though? As far as I am aware, each trademark is only granted for a specific list of market segments. Anything beyond that, and beyond offering products/services, should be (mostly) in the clear.
I think it's a good idea from the Rust Foundation to prevent others from naming threir convention "RustCamp" or something similar, and I don't think they're doing much more.