Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's an odd opinion about a language with a lot of class related features. I can only assume you have a very strong definition of OOP.


OOP doesn't mean that your language has a "class" keyword, nor dot notation for calling functions.


I enjoyed the pragmatic historical definition of OOP given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI where essential it can be seen as subtype polymorphism




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: