Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I read through the RFC and I think it's fair it was rejected, because this was ultimately a half-measure, with severe usability restrictions.

Fat pointers are clearly a way to deal with arrays (and also get "slices" and non-zero terminated strings for free!), but it's just not possible to retrofit them into the language without breaking existing code.

 help



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: