Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

my point was that f() had been defined static then you can't access it from outside the translation unit it is defined in - in other words, it is "private". i'm afraid i'm unclear what your point is.
 help



Both points are related and matter.

For most purposes, not being able to access something, and being able to access something not officially in an interface, where doing so introduces an unpredictable breaking dependency, the practical result is the same: You can't (actually/sensibly) do it.


Then why not define "something" as static, which makes the compiler and linker guarantee that you can't do it?

What if I want to internally access it from multiple compilation units, but not necessarily encourage downstream users from using it? This is really common.

`static inline` is definitely not private. See https://github.com/axboe/liburing/blob/master/src/include/li... , for a practical example.

It's going to become private, but its part of your side of the interface, not of the other side. The ABI boundary is between that `static inline` function and the library, not between that function and your code.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: