DXGI+D3D11 via C is actually fine and is close or even lower than Metalv1 when i... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		flohofwoe 3 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Simplifying Vulkan one subsystem at a time DXGI+D3D11 via C is actually fine and is close or even lower than Metalv1 when it comes to 'lines of code needed to get a triangle on screen". D3D12 is more boilerplate-heavy, but still not as bad as Vulkan.

pjmlp 3 days ago [–]

I guess at least that way is easier to have bindings.

I like COM as idea, but the tooling execution could be so much better.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact