> Why would understanding his argument necessarily mean finding it persuasive or exhaustive?
Alexis King is a woman.
> that languages with rich DX around rigid typing encourage an architecture that's rigidly typed, and that rigidly typed codebases tend to come up against predictable issues.
Alexis King is a woman.
> that languages with rich DX around rigid typing encourage an architecture that's rigidly typed, and that rigidly typed codebases tend to come up against predictable issues.
I agree with neither of these points.