1000 in 10,000 mammograms come back positive by human radiologist.
50 in 10,000 are actually cancer.
It is interesting that the article did not say what the positive rate of detection was, or the false positive rate.
Either way, of course, The next step would be to have a human eyeball it. Probably in India or China or some other low-cost provider. Only the wealthiest can afford the immense salary of a US-based radiologist.
Fun fact: I know a radiologist and her visual acuity is freaky good. I doubt that AI will be able to beat her unless they force it into a multi-day marathon.
Are you sure?
"You're right to push back. Upon reinspection, it appears to be something else."