Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He isn't saying CISPA should be opposed, but rather, additional specific legislation to protect individual's data from being retrieved by the government without due process.


But that is already unlawful.


I think the recent thread about how people can be compelled to keep searches and confiscations secret makes my point sufficiently clear. I think by "due process" you mean "according the law". By "due process", I mean in a very fair, transparent, limited and well-defined way.

edit: Specifically, this is a precedent that is a big step in the right direction for this kind of thing, IMO: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5382891


I was pointing out a misunderstanding of what he was saying.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: