>You get the feeling that the author has spent so long thinking of women as 'us' and men as 'them' that she actually sees the two as two completely separate species.
As is the case with most feminists of today. This is sexism by itself which they don't understand well and the main problem arises simply because they look at things in an extremely binary fashion - If 'something' is sexism or not or if it offends them or not. This is the reason why I am extremely scared (not exaggerating) to sit next to women in tech conferences these days - Simply because I fear I might end up offending them in one way or the other, by doing something I do regularly (like talking about a USB pendrive or a Mac mini) which might have sexual double meanings, which they would then create a huge drama about.
It seems like you think of women as "them" as well. Have you tried listening to what women are trying to tell you, rather than assuming that half the population is so fundamentally irrational that you need to avoid them in public?
As is the case with most feminists of today. This is sexism by itself which they don't understand well and the main problem arises simply because they look at things in an extremely binary fashion - If 'something' is sexism or not or if it offends them or not. This is the reason why I am extremely scared (not exaggerating) to sit next to women in tech conferences these days - Simply because I fear I might end up offending them in one way or the other, by doing something I do regularly (like talking about a USB pendrive or a Mac mini) which might have sexual double meanings, which they would then create a huge drama about.
Spot on Ryan.