There is a big difference between these two scenarios:

1) One group of people becomes enormously rich through some peaceful, economic means, while another group remains relatively poor.

2) One group of people uses oppressive political power to become rich, at the expense of another group, which remains poor.

My problem is with #2. If we were talking about #1, I'd be right there with you complaining about class warfare rhetoric.

I wish you had clarified this earlier, as it's a drastically different argument than what you seemed to be making.

I think I know the answer to this question, but out of curiosity, what argument did I seem to be making?