Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
NotOscarWilde
on Nov 25, 2014
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Slack's New Arbitration Policy
The way I understand the agreement, if you accept it you are bound to use JAMS as the arbitration company -- you may have choice of a specific arbiter inside that company but you have to use that company. Is my understanding correct?
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: